Initial gut reaction 1-Not at all 10-Yes, definitely
Did I convey presenter’s overall message? 1
Did I deliver the interpretation with confidence? 1
What is the presenter’s purpose?: The purpose is to teach an audience about cells and their structure.
What is the presenter’s attitude toward the topic?: (emotive, excited, lethargic…) It sounded like a machine was speaking so it was very lethargic and monotone.
What was the presenter’s language quality? (clear, redundant, evasive, tangents…) The language was clear, but monotone. It sounded like a machine so it was hard to listen and take in the information.
How was the audio/visual quality? The video quality was good. The audio sounded fine, but it was tough to listen to the monotone voice.
How did the presenter structure the presentation? He built on the information and used slides and pictures to help the audience visualize the cell. He presented a single cell, then multi-cellular organisms, then plant and animal cells.
Did the source text use any culturally bound information or topic-specific jargon? The entire video was topic-specific jargon because it was an educational video about science. There wasn't any culturally bound information.
Brief notes: WOW-that was bad. I sat not moving for quite a bit of that video. I had no idea what to do or what he meant. I am not really a science person so that video was out of my comfort zone and it was very difficult to portray the concepts in a way I thought the audience would understand.
No comments:
Post a Comment