Stylit 3/23/17

Initial gut reaction 1-Not at all   10-Yes, definitely

Did I convey presenter’s overall message? 9

Did I deliver the interpretation with confidence? 9

What is the presenter’s purpose?: He's sharing a new technology and what it does, how it works. 

What is the presenter’s attitude toward the topic?: (emotive, excited, lethargic…) He is excited about the new technology. He wants to share its capabilities with the audience. 

What was the presenter’s language quality? (clear, redundant, evasive, tangents…) His language is clear and he has a really good pace. 

How was the audio/visual quality? The audio and visual quality were good. 

How did the presenter structure the presentation? He used his pictures to demonstrate the pen's abilities so it was mostly telling the audience what he was doing on the paper. 

Did the source text use any culturally bound information or topic-specific jargon?  There was some topic specific jargon when talking about the specific types of utensils used to create the art (oil painting, colored pencils, cross-hatching).

Brief notes: This was really fun to interpret.  It was a good pace for something I'm not familiar with so I think I did pretty well.  I think I did well adding in the audience's reactions and the hosts reactions off to the side too.  It was clear that other people were responding to his creations, not just him responding to himself.