Thursday, March 2, 2017

For the Birds - 3/2/17

Initial gut reaction 1-Not at all   10-Yes, definitely
Did I convey presenter’s overall message? 5
Did I deliver the interpretation with confidence?5
What is the presenter’s purpose?: Entertain the audience
What was the presenter’s language quality? (clear, redundant, evasive, tangents…) Even though there was no language, the storyline was very clear and I could follow it easily. Portraying it in ASL was difficult though. 
How was the audio/visual quality? The video quality was very good and clear. 
How did the presenter structure the presentation? It was a cartoon. The characters were set up and a problem and the reaction to that problem were shown.
Did the source text use any culturally bound information or topic-specific jargon?  There was no culturally bound information or topic-specific jargon.
Brief notes: This was actually really hard to interpret. I tried to think of what the Deaf Blind client would be getting from my production and I don't think I did very well. I think I should have acted out more instead of signing some of the signs/words.  Even though I knew the signs, I should've taken on the birds characters more in order to make the story more dynamic.  

No comments:

Post a Comment